Potestis Hoc Legere?

Time for Bacon I Guess

The scientific method usually follows this: 1) Ask a question 2) Do your research 3) Construct a hypothesis 4) Experimental Setup/Test it 5) If the outcome does not uphold the hypothesis, modify the hypothesis. 6) Send out data and maybe get a beer (I do not condone underage drinking or drinking while driving, just to clear it up). Asking a question is simple, it's like asking, "Is my house haunted?" Done. Doing your research. People might just think that they'd have to sift through town records of mass killings and suicides, but no you may have to look at other things. Like, that door just closed. Is it because of air pressure or because of a ghost? You'd have to like, set up really sensitive detectors around your house. Like ones that can predict air pressure, temperature inside and outside (especially if the "cold room" has an open window), maybe you'd have to acquire a sample of the wooden frame your house is made of (figure out...

Nescio

I guess this is a bit controversial, maybe it's just a new hobby now. Yeah ghosts are considered part of pseudoscience, something unprofessional and something that actual scientists don't associate with. I guess maybe there is a way, scientifically (with like, control groups (perhaps a house that definitely isn't haunted, and a house that is haunted? I'll think more later), graphs (temperature over the day, of course I will have to compare between normal temperature outside over the day as well), sleep patterns of the victims (self explanatory), comparisons between "ghost orbs" and dust/moisture orbs (this one ghost picture my mom took at a friend's house looks an awful like a moving dust orb now I saw a dust orb)). I mean I don't know any haunted places near me, but maybe here I can make scientific methods of trying to find ghosts? Don't trust my word on it, I'm about to return to high school in two weeks, but maybe this will be fun.

Taedeor II

Addendum: If L was imaginary, that means motion of the light clock, and consequently its observer, in an imaginary direction. What could that mean? Perhaps a fourth spatial dimension? Of course, you'd have to go forth and back between the fourth dimension and our third otherwise I suppose you'd be trapped forever in some higher dimensional plane and that doesn't sound pleasant. How would that work? It's quite convoluted. I'll try to draw it, beginning with a four-dimensional space-time graph (or at least my best attempt at it). The real issue with people when they try to make things 4-dimensionally is that they concern over continuity. At integer-time intervals like what I'm making, it becomes simple, I guess. The spacetime diagram gives the relevant details for 3-dimensional space plus a time dimension. For simplicity, assume that each progressing XYZ-axis to the right signifies an advance in the time dimension by one tick (or whatever they...

Read the URL

Search This Blog